Page 26 - PWM2023_March
P. 26

TECHNOLOGY REPORT










































      Reputation rescue








                                B                                           legally), that finds its way into the public domain, is likely
                                         ut what of reputational damage that follows
                                         on from the actions of an employee? How
                                                                            to be reputationally damaging. Likewise, if an employee
                                         should employers react? On the one hand
                                                                            behaves inappropriately during working hours and is
       Reputations, like                 there’s the need to protect the firm, on the   clearly identifiable as a company employee, their
       trust, are hard to earn           other, there’s a requirement to be fair when   employer might justly accuse them of bringing the com-
                                         investigating.
       and easy to lose.         Consider the case of an employee of a US-based direct   pany into disrepute.”
                                                                             This last example was demonstrated by a case in which
       Threats to a reputa-     mail company, Navistar Direct Marketing, based in   an employee was dismissed following an allegation of bul-
       tion come in many        Maryland, who was caught on camera rioting in the US   lying and harassment by a member of the public. His
       forms – rivals making    Capitol in January. Wearing his company ID wasn’t the   claim for unfair dismissal was dismissed as he was wear-
       underhand allega-        brightest thing to do; it led to his identification, the com-  ing the company’s branded uniform during the incident,
                                pany fielding comments from the public, and his dis-
                                                                            so his actions directly impacted his employer’s reputa-
       tions, activity by       missal.                                     tion.
       state-run organs and                                                  But for Amanda Trewhella, managing associate at
       malevolence in ele-       Context is everything                      Freeths, reputational damage caused by an employee to
       ments of the press.       According to Tina Chander, partner and head of the   an organisation depends upon how well known the
                                employment law team at Wright Hassall, it’s important to   employee is, whether the public associate them with their
       Words by                 recognise that every case of employee-related reputa-  employer, as well as the seriousness of their actions. She
       Adam Bernstein           tional damage is different and further, “context is every-  says “it is particularly likely that for those with a high pro-
                                thing when considering whether an employee has caused   file in the public eye poor conduct could cause reputa-
                                their employer reputational damage”.        tional damage to their employer”.
                                 She offers examples to make her point: “For anyone   And she illustrates this with the example of Kay Burley,
                                involved with children or vulnerable people, any miscon-  a Sky News presenter, who broke Covid rules during her
                                duct of a sexual nature, even if enacted in private (and   60th birthday party celebration. The matter was investi-


      26 PrintWeek MENA March 2023                                                                www.printweekmena.com
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31