Page 27 - PWM2025_OCTOBER EBOOK
P. 27

BETTER BUSINESS





                                                              nesses finding the current economic   “Since the advent of the sentencing
                                                              background difficult. He says that   guidelines, introduced in 2016,
                                                              “with rising employment costs,   which based the level of penalty on
                                                              there’s pressure on delivering the   culpability, harm and turnover
                                                              perfect product to the client within   (rather than profit) with set ranges of
                                                              tight timeframes along with the   fine levels, the courts have had a less
                                                              requirement to be both sustainable   subjective approach to sentencing
                                                              and profitable”.
                                                               He continues: “This can place a   (where one never knew what the
                                                              strain on what can be perceived as   level of fine was going to be) to the
                                                              the ‘intangibles’ within the business,   objective approach adopted in the
                                                              with less attention being paid to   guidelines”. In other words, the final
                                                              training, oversight, supervision and   level of fine will be within a range
                                                              so on, which in turn can lead to   decided through a stepped approach
                                                              errors in the way tasks are   with aggravating and mitigating fac-
                                                              approached and completed.”  tors being considered.
                                                               Against this background he says it   Robson explains more about the
                                                              is easy to see why incidents occur.  magnitude of the fines: “Under the
                                                               Even so, he believes that incidents   guidelines... if convicted of a health
                                                              happen not because businesses do   and safety offence, large organisa-
                                                              not have the correct systems and pol-  tions that turn over more than £50m
                                                              icies in place, but “that normal every-  and fall into the ‘very high’ culpabil-
                                                              day running of the business get in the   ity category could be fined up to
                                                              way their adherence”.      £10m.” And this was the case with
                                                               As he says, “nobody wants a work-  the fine handed to Industrial
                                                              place incident to occur, but it is   Chemicals.
                                                              impossible to eliminate all risks, so,   Given this, Robson offers guidance
                                                              as is recognised in the 1974 Act, the   to those in the midst of an incident
                                                              object is to reduce the risk of that   and investigation: It’s critical to con-
                                                              incident happening to as low as is   duct a thorough investigation “which
                                                              reasonably practicable”.   if conducted effectively will highlight
                                                               Interacting with the HSE  improvements to prevent recur-
      for easy access as health conditions often occur over time and it’s useful to   So, what happens when the HSE   rence”.
      clearly evidence checks undertaken whilst employed with the company”.   visits as the result of an accident?  Collins also has useful advice to
       But while the physical is obvious, Collins says to remember that health   Here Collins says that the HSE   share. He says that the person man-
      issues don’t have to be physical to come under the aegis of the HSE. He   officers he has dealt with – he used to   aging the situation for the company
      refers to statistics for 2023/24 that show that 1.7m workers in Great Britain   prosecute on behalf of the HSE, so   should oversee the inspection pro-
      experienced work-related ill health, including 776,000 cases of stress,   knows a large number – have “always   cess, seek legal advice immediately –
      depression, or anxiety – work-related mental ill-health amounted for   been highly professional and recog-  even if it just a telephone
      around half of the 33.7m working days lost in this sphere. This is why he says   nise that when they go onto a site fol-  conversation, cooperate, and aim to
      that “the HSE as part of its 2024/25 business plan is focusing upon mental   lowing an incident, it is likely that is   be the main point of contact with
      health and stress”.                                     the first time that business has been   police and HSE.
                                                              involved in any kind of formal inves-  Further, he recommends manag-
      The main causes of incidents                            tigation”.                 ing the evidence, the interview pro-
       It’s fair to say that ‘life happens’ and by extension, so do accidents. But that   Given this, he says that “the feed-  cess, and documents by which he
      doesn’t abrogate the need for organisations – employers – to do all they can   back I have received from clients is   means preserving existing docu-
      to minimise risks. And this is something that Robson recognises. As she   that, while they do not like the fact   ments, providing copies as requested
      says, “there will be accidents in any sector, for sure, no matter how much   that they are in that position, the   and keeping records and schedules,
      attention is focused on health and safety. The important factor is to build a   inspectors are fair and clear in their   and supervising the management,
      preventative robust safety management system to ensure action has been   investigation”.  communications, and links to insur-
      taken to control all elements of risk where possible.”   But it’s clear – from the headlines   ers and lawyers. In her opinion, mak-
       From her position, it doesn’t help that “the legislation in the industry is   at the top of this story, if nothing else   ing sure that a filing system is robust
      lengthy, often confusing, especially if a company hasn’t a competent health   – that penalties are rising. But this is   enough so that records can easily be
      and safety person within the business to translate this into simple tasks”.  not a recent phenomenon.   found is key to a smooth-running
       But from Collins’ perspective, there’s a concern: manufacturing busi-  Collins explains what has changed:   HSE visit.



      www.printweekmena.com                                                                    October 2025  PrintWeek MENA 25
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32